Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

September 4th, 2008
September 3rd, 2008
September 2nd, 2008
August 30th, 2008
August 29th, 2008
August 28th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Jurors to begin deliberations next week in Alamo trial

By Layla Bohm
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Saturday, March 4, 2006 7:43 AM PST

STOCKTON — Paul Alamo testified Friday that he shot Mark Hasty only after Hasty beat his own chest and head in an aggressive manner and lunged at Alamo with a knife.

Alamo's detailed account about the shooting death of Hasty completed testimony in the case. Jurors next week will begin deliberating Alamo's fate.


Paul Alamo

Alamo, charged with murder in the Oct. 13, 2003, shooting death of 47-year-old Hasty, spent Friday morning on the witness stand. Unlike the previous day's testimony, which reduced most people in the courtroom to tears, Alamo calmly answered questions from Deputy District Attorney Lester Fleming.

"At the time you pulled the trigger, did you intend to kill Mark Hasty?" the San Joaquin County prosecutor asked.

"No I didn't," Alamo, 48, replied.

Fleming pressed further, getting Alamo to acknowledge that he'd pointed the gun at the man's chest.

"At the time you pulled the trigger and aimed at Mr. Hasty's chest, were you aware that bullets could kill him?" he asked.

Alamo paused, then answered quietly, "Yes."

Until a few days before the shooting, Alamo and Hasty had lived in the same neighborhood east of Highway 99 but never knew one another. Then, as rural burglaries increased, the Alamo Alarm Company owner began investigating them, saying Sheriff's deputies were stretched too thin and weren't dedicating enough time to finding the suspects.

On the day of the shooting, Hasty was driving around the neighborhood, and at one point stopped and yelled at the gate in front of Alamo's home.

When Alamo learned of this, he got his gun and decided to drive around the neighborhood.

He stopped at a home under construction, which afforded a view of the Hasty home, and was about to call a Sheriff's detective when he saw a man cleaning the partially finished home, Alamo testified. Alamo stopped and talked to him, and then Hasty's truck arrived at the end of the dirt driveway, he said.

Hasty got out, then went back to his truck and leaned inside.

Alamo was convinced that Hasty had reached into his truck for a gun, so he put a clip in his own gun and moved behind his car.

"If he has a gun I'm not going to be the sitting duck inside my car," Alamo said, recounting the events of that night.

Then, he testified, he saw that the object was not a gun but a knife.

"I'm looking at him, I'm looking specifically at his hands, and then the motion is coming closer," he said.

"And then he did a real peculiar thing to me. I've seen it in boxing matches before. He did this pounding thing," Alamo said, demonstrating by beating his fists on his chest and head, while Hasty's family members shook their heads in disbelief.

The silver metallic knife was about 4 inches long, and Hasty was holding it in his clenched fist, Alamo testified.

"I would back up three steps, pause and he would gain," Alamo said, adding that he was on uneven dirt and at one point stumbled.

Then, according to Alamo, Hasty lunged at him. To demonstrate, Alamo stepped down from the witness stand while Fleming stood in front of the jury. Alamo pretended to lunge at him, bent over at the waist, pretending to clutch a knife in his right hand.

It was then, Alamo said, that he shot Hasty twice. Hasty's face "went from complete total madman rage, monster, to immediate calm" as he turned and walked away before collapsing on the ground, Alamo testified.

He said he tried calling 911 but couldn't get through, tried a Sheriff's detective but got the wrong number and then called his wife.

In the meantime, he walked over to Hasty, but that's when "hostile ladies" arrived from the Hasty home.

Deputies arrived and found no knife at the scene, but defense attorney Ralph Cingcon has said someone could have moved the knife from the scene before law enforcement arrived.

"At the time you saw Mr. Hasty coming at you with a knife, what were you thinking?" Cingcon said, asking his last question of the trial. Alamo replied, "He was going to kill me."

The night before the shooting, Alamo was conducting surveillance when an alarm went off and he tracked the suspects to a vehicle parked at the Hasty home. Sheriff's deputies arrived, then returned to the Hasty home the next day.

In the meantime, a neighbor had told Alamo that, years earlier, Hasty had been accused of stealing pumpkins, then arrested when deputies found marijuana plants on his property.

Attorneys rested their case at 11:30 a.m. Friday, then spent the afternoon discussing proposed jury instructions with Judge Bernard Garber.

The judge had initially told jurors the trial might last as much as 10 weeks, but after five weeks of trial, deliberations are expected to get underway next week. Closing arguments will begin Tuesday at 9 a.m. in the Stockton courthouse.

Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

First published: Friday, March 3, 2006

Reader Feedback

Mrs.Mark Hasty wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:55 PM:

" Mark had a knife and said he would kill paul as soon as his drugs wore off. I took the knife from the scene. Sorry paul. "

Boing**** wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:26 PM:

" Critical Thinker... Me thinks it IS CRITICAL, See a doctor befor it gets worse. "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:24 PM:

" Wake up and turn the page IDIOTS! PS: Paul is a wonderful person & you should be very thankful he's so willing to place himself in this mess for your sake. Kinda like another person 2000 years ago. We are blessed. "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:47 PM:

" Time to move on to the next "The Defendant Is A Murderer" story. The jury should make short work of the decision process. The judge needs to stay on task during the penalty phase and not be softened by remorsful defendant or his greiving family. "

Lodi News Paper wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:33 PM:

" NEW RELEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:10 PM:

" http://www.kxtv10.com/storyfull.asp?id=5914 "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:53 PM:

" oooooooooooo paul!!! OOOOOOOOOOOO. Harder!!!!!!!!! "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:32 PM:

" “Bill.S” I have been reading in some trade magazines about security / alarms and it to even mentions it, how sad "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:29 PM:

" I spoke to a friend of Paul’s today and even he thinks he will walk. This is murder and no gives a crap! "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:26 PM:

" This story has turned into how bad of a person Hasty was, and how great a person Paul was for stopping this thief, the Hasty family lost there father and husband I guess that’s not important anymore "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:23 PM:

" And further more who really cares if Hasty stole pumpkins or grew pot or was stealing, wouldn’t a properly working alarm fix this? "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:20 PM:

" How come the stories keep changing? From a putty knife to 4 inch knife then I read the Stockton record and it says 5 inch knife, Paul is up for murder and no can even get he story straight, then the eye witness says there is no knife, "

Scott Peterson wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:03 PM:

" I am waiting for you Paully..... "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:17 PM:

" GenXer... Hoowheeeee. Gettin to you again already? Seriously Mr."D" you better quit lickin that finger and take a slide across that Psychotropic Mushroom. You know, like mark taught ya. "

Paulsbunghole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:07 PM:

" I must appolgize to everyone on the board for I let Lamont escape again. Please forgive me "

Paulsbunghole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:05 PM:

" LAMONT YOU KNOW ONLY TO CALL ME DADDY! YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS WHEN DADDY LOSES CONTROL..... "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:04 PM:

" MHRC... Absolutly! It is undoubtedly a Moronic point of view you've expressed. "

Gen Xer wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:03 PM:

" So please crawl back in your hole. Even by attempting to support Paul on this board he'll never forgive you. Really just go away. "

Lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:01 PM:

" PBH...Not the daddy thing again. That's really gettin old. Lick a mushroom & find something fun within your murky id. "

MHRC wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:01 PM:

" Dude lamont your a moron according to you every one who doesnt agree with you has to be a drug abuser, thats a moronic point of veiw dont you think "

Gen Xer wrote on Mar 7, 2006 6:01 PM:

" Guys really Lamont a.k.a. LAMBMONT should be ignored after all it was just last week he was fooled by a bunghole and a Gen Xer. Lamont we know who you are and we don't love you just like the rest of your family. "

Paulsbunghole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:56 PM:

" Lamont Now you know better. You need to come and get your love, my little boy "

ADA wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:54 PM:

" Lori, I figured she would run and hide! "

Lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:53 PM:

" Lori... That's Nasty! Got a thing for BlogDongs do we? Oooooh! that is kinky. Keep it up. I mean, well, Keep a stiff... er, oh ferget it. "

Paulsbung hole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:52 PM:

" LAMONT NOW BOW you shouldn't call people names "

The Real MHRC wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:52 PM:

" the HOMO talk in here is really old PAULS GUILTY thats all there is there ain't no more "

Paulsbunghole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:51 PM:

" LAMONT LAMONT COME home now! Your daddy is waiting for you!! I don't want those mean people on the board to make you angry again. Come home and be daddy's little boy! "

Lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:48 PM:

" OK you Idiots, Yes I'm Back. You've had enough time to swallow the pills, inject yourselves & have a toke, Soooo... it's time for your Idiotic Iterations once more. But first this word from reality... Paul was correct. "

Lori wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:43 PM:

" Hey lamont! what you have a small penis or what? "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:41 PM:

" at least I never murdered anyone!! ~Lodi Wealthy Folk~ ~Just concerned~ OR KISS BUTT LIKE YOU GUYS DO!! and for my wealth HA HA HA you will never know! "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:41 PM:

" Lori... Oh! No! Not you Too!.. Sharons "Black ford expedition"? WOW! is it an Eddie Bower? Does it have lots of shiney buttons & oh My, don't tell me. Not a DVD. Nooooo! Please dont tell us it's actually used by her family. I'm Sooooo jealous to. "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:28 PM:

" onguard...Toooook ya a while DumDum. Was it the superior intelect or the far superior intelect that gave it away. IDIOT! "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:26 PM:

" I am a fa g. "

Lori wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:23 PM:

" If sharon was smart she would pack her stuff and the kids into her black ford expedition and leave town, you find a wife that hasn’t ever pulled out a long kitchen knife while her husband was there, she is in trouble. "

Just concerned wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:23 PM:

" Lodi Wealthy Folk... Pete lost his job as marks fence. Now he's pissed at paul for destroying his lucrative yet substandard income. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:21 PM:

" LodiWF...Lamont now who's leaving fingerprints...what happened...getting too hot in here...or did your son paul tell you to knock it off... "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:19 PM:

" Bloggers do your homework. There was no knife. At one point the defendant was calling it a putty knife. To the jury a shiny 4 inch knife sounds more dangerous. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:19 PM:

" ...paul's actions have had effect on many people (professionals believe it or not)...we are all sick of him... "

Lodi Wealthy Folk wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:17 PM:

" Sooooo Pete. You ARE still worried about other people having far more than you. Why dont you simply earn more. Like we do. Oh! First you gotta dump the mind altering substances. Then associate with honest, educated and clean citizens. "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:15 PM:

" yeah your right about that "onguard" but if a robber shot Paul I am sure he will not get off on 333,000 bail and 2 and 1/2 years out. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:15 PM:

" ...you all who have figured out who's who on this discussion board would be surprised to know who we really are...there's a reason why we can't use our real names... "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:13 PM:

" ...you all watch...if paul walks, he will "get off"...he will continue to play "COPS AND ROBBERS" until one day the robber will also have a gun... "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:11 PM:

" ...yes I do have a knife, several knives in fact... "

The Devil wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:10 PM:

" Paulsbunghole AKA: GenXer AKA: MHRC AKA: PaulLamo etc,etc,etc... WHAT? "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:09 PM:

" This could go on for ever as long as he has money? "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:09 PM:

" So will Paul be able to appeal any decisions that comes out of the deliberation that he doesn’t like? "

Gay_Guy_In_Lodi wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:06 PM:

" Paulsbunghole... I want you too, but MHRC is first. Tomorrow good for you? "

Paulsbunghole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:04 PM:

" Gay_Guy_In_Lodi... I want you. Now! "

Friends of Mark wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:01 PM:

" WE ARE ALL I D I O T S! "

MOM wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:59 PM:

" MHRC... Do you mean it son or are you just funnin me? I've known about you n pa for quite some time now. Saw the lust in your eyes as you chewed his schlong. It means I'll have to use the fakie on ya again. Love Mom. "

Paul Lamo wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:53 PM:

" NO ! I have it! "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:51 PM:

" And Paul never once saw anyone take the knife from this dieing man while he was sitting against his car watching?? "

Pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:48 PM:

" No,No, I REALLY DO HAVE IT. SUCKERS. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:47 PM:

" You guys cant all cover for me. Thanks, but I will confess soon cause it hurts me so to live a lie. HeHeHee! "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:46 PM:

" no no I have it! "

MHRC wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:44 PM:

" Ok, I confess. Too much homo sex with my dad caused me to do it. I have the knife. Really. I am telling the truth this time. Mom, I'm sorry I cheated on you. I'll make up for it tonight. Meet ya in pauls garage at 3AM like always. "

Boobs wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:40 PM:

" No!...I have it. "

Gay_Guy_In_Lodi wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:39 PM:

" I Have the knife. "

Paulsbunghole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:37 PM:

" Thats right! The hasty's do have the knife. "

Knows wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:35 PM:

" CriticalThinker, The two helping mark also helped themselves to his knife. "

Lamonts Permanent Blog wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:32 PM:

" Notice how lamont was honored with a permanent Blog header. That's because the knife is the key issue & the Hasty clan knows where it is. thats the final word. "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:31 PM:

" "Critical Thinker" Paul has always played Magnum P I. even 20 years ago when he started! "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:30 PM:

" This guy through his attorney represented himself as a Neighborhood Watch Captain. He started this Neighborhood Watch "smokescreen" only after he commited murder. Jury, don't buy the B.S. "

The-Devil wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:27 PM:

" I am waiting for you Paul. You did a very bad thing. God told me I can take you. You going to hell. All see you in hell. "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:25 PM:

" This guy thought he was Jim Rockford driving around in his Camaro or Firebird doing surveillance and investigations. Those that know him said he had changed (personality) long before the shooting took place. He's not the only crackpot vigilante in the hood. "

Boobs wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:23 PM:

" Do you think Paul had anything to do with the power out here in Lodi yesterday? Maybe paul did not was us talking about him so he cut the power!!! Nice try paul! "

Gay_Guy_In_Lodi wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:22 PM:

" Paul is such a bad man. He and his chrush don't like gay people!! Paul has said "God Hate fags"!!! Paul, you are the anti christ! "

Gay_Guy_In_Lodi wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:19 PM:

" I hope the Hasty family goes after Pauls money!!! HAHAHHA I have heard has a large collection of cars! Better start selling them PauL!!!! Burn in hell Paul. "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:19 PM:

" he was craving Taco Bell. "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:17 PM:

" Why didn't the defendant attempt to administer first aid? He stood back and let others who arrived after the fact try to save the guy. I know of at least two that attempted to save while the defendant leaned back against his Camaro looking smug. "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 4:05 PM:

" yes I believe that the rest of the Hasty Family will still have to put up with allot! Paul is not done yet by any means. "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:54 PM:

" You mean surveillance! Hidden cameras in trash cans or fire hydrants or barrels or light poles! "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:39 PM:

" ...I mean some reletless paparazzi type stalking paul with cameras like paul has done to others.... "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:38 PM:

" ...yeah I was thinking along the lines that the story of October 13, 2003 is the end of the story not the beginning...wouldn't it be great to get some rotten little dirt digging reporter hot on paul's heals? "

Lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:36 PM:

" Oh Paul!!Harder!!!!!!!! oooooooooo Paul, I love it like that!!! I'm going to miss you when you go to jail! "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:32 PM:

" easy guys! everyone is innocent till proven guilty! you guys know that! well except the Hasty family this is.. "

Gay_Guy_In_Lodi wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:22 PM:

" So did they hang Alamo yet? Come on Jury, Lets speed it up! The sooner you hang him and he goes to hell the better! Burn in Hell Paul Alamo!!!!! HANG HIM!!!!! HANG HIM!!!!! "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:22 PM:

" "onguard" yes talk about a lack of ink on this! the media talks about less important news that is local, may try 60 mins or 20 20! also try Bill O'Riley @ Fox news, he loves big cover ups like this. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:11 PM:

" ...I heard a quick blurb on a local radio station yesterday about the trial...wouldn't it be nice if the local television media would report this story? "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:09 PM:

" ...I don't know Jenny Hasty but I do know paul...he will pull out all the stops to destroy her...he's not done...not by a "long shot"...I thought media exposure would help foil paul... "

onugard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 3:07 PM:

" I sent an e-mail to People Magazine today...I hope they publish this story...despite whatever the outcome of the verdict may be, this story despirately needs more exposure... "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 1:13 PM:

" For the last 2 plus years he has been telling anyone who will listen that he did us all a favor. Maybe the D.A. took so long to get this one to trial in the hopes that this guy would blow himself up. "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 1:08 PM:

" Even though some of the postings are a little crass my suspicion is that jurors are also thinking that the shooting was far too extreme a measure for a guy who at the most was swearing and beating his chest. "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 7, 2006 10:11 AM:

" I couldn’t even imagine the stress Paul is under not knowing what his fait will be. "

Lodi Law wrote on Mar 7, 2006 10:05 AM:

" if its a fast deliberation that would mean the jury already know Paul’s fait with out a doubt. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 10:03 AM:

" ...hard telling...I wasn't there for any of the trial...fast if the popularity contest winner is cut and dry...slow could cause a hung jury... "

SJA wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:12 AM:

" No court yesterday...Begins again this morning! Got to go BYE "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:12 AM:

" "onguard" does it help if the deliberations go by fast or slow? "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:06 AM:

" ...hopefully today will be the day! "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:05 AM:

" pete...I am hoping that LNS has no new story because there is nothing to report...I am not following the court...I can only assume that yesterday was probably burned by the Judge giving instructions to Jury "

Charlie Brown wrote on Mar 7, 2006 9:02 AM:

" I bought some pumpkins for a really cheap price once from Mark Hasty but none of them were GREAT "

pete wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:57 AM:

" "onguard" any idea when the deliberations may be over! I am planning a little get together for all x-employees and friends, oh and "lamont" your invited too, BYOG = bring your own gun! ops I mean beer. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:51 AM:

" look out paulsbunghole...because onguard's in the mood for "FLUSHING" Lamont out.... "

Kenny K wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:49 AM:

" Hey! Paul did his share of drugs too, don’t let anyone tell you anything different. "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:48 AM:

" ...come on old man...who's really the idiot!!!! "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:46 AM:

" ...hello...it appears that paul did intend to kill Hasty...and it REALLY sounds like paul was LYING UNDER OATH IN A COURT OF LAW...TAKE A LIE DETECTOR TEST PAUL...you can't because you are a liar...your father exposed you!!!! "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:43 AM:

" ...hey everyone 367jr, MHRC, Critical Thinker, Pete...did you hear loud and clear what Lamnot said "PAUL WAS RIGHT IN RIDDING US ALL OF MARK HASTY"... "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:30 AM:

" Paulsbunghole...I beg of you...PLEASE FLUSH THE TOILET!!! "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:27 AM:

" ...ps...the only person that I ever got drugs from was paul... "

onguard wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:26 AM:

" Goodmoring Lamont...Nice to see you at the family reunion...you all shouldn't have been celebrating paul's victory so soon...will pictures of paul in prison be in the grandkids scrapbook? "

paulsbunghole wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:14 AM:

" Warning Warning I let Lamont out....SORRY "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 8:01 AM:

" Hasty Alarm Company? I wonder if they also receive all the business goodwill that goes along with their new business? "

Lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:56 AM:

" IDIOTS... I now know why you are soooo jumpy. Your drug supplier has gone away. My,My,My, What to do! "

Lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:53 AM:

" All Idiots listen up... Today, Please try and be honest. I know that means saying nothing, But... that's what your doing anyway. Do some of marks drugs instead.PS; PAUL WAS RIGHT IN RIDDING US ALL OF MARK HASTY. "

lamont wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:42 AM:

" Have a nice weekend Idiots? PAUL WAS CORRECT!PERIOD. "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 7, 2006 7:16 AM:

" Today is a good day to convict on all counts...... "

dmrjr wrote on Mar 7, 2006 5:52 AM:

" Don't worry Pete... The assets are easy to track. Especially those collector cars, land, homes and anything with the business!!! "

pete wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:53 PM:

" I am sure Paul has everything hidden by now, that's way they took 2 and 1/2 years to go to court, so when the civil trial starts the Hasty's are starving and may settle faster, everything is in the best interest of Paul and his company.. very slick.... "

MHRC wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:14 PM:

" who the hell started the homo stuff??? i mean we all know lamont is a queer but thats not news is it??? "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 6, 2006 8:36 PM:

" You "guys" are getting a little off the subject!!!!!! "

U Need Glasses wrote on Mar 6, 2006 8:33 PM:

" Homophobic, The Sentinel never reported that Hasty was queer only that the guy on trial was. Paper said something about this guy being in some gay cowboy movie. "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:50 PM:

" ...so both Rowes are gone...who does actually work there now besides paul and his VP son Justin...too bad there will be no company to leave to his kids... "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:46 PM:

" I got home to no power...I thought maybe Lamont blew up the LNS to stop the publishing of the next article... "

x wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:39 PM:

" I heard that Sid Bowers is the new GM or was he the new night janitor "

367jr wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:30 PM:

" And Paul can continue his search for the ever elusive knife! "

In the Know wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:28 PM:

" Dave Sr. was canned from Bay Alarm back in the day. I can't remember the exact details. No clue about Jr. Glad to see Dave gone he was an ass. By the way WHO is running Pauls sinking ship? "

367jr wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:28 PM:

" Onguard; The karma also got Jonnie Cochran. He died of an inoperable brain tumor...The price he had to pay to let OJ continue his search for the killer. If Paul gets off(NOW LAMONT!)Cingcon's karma will be errr SHOT "

Homophobic wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:13 PM:

" All these "the guy is gay" comments. Did the district attorney explore the notion that maybe these two knew each other in an entirely different way. Maybe this was a lovers quarrel with tragic results. "

x wrote on Mar 6, 2006 6:09 PM:

" whatever happened to the witness that said that Alamo and Hasty were "street racing" several times before the shoot? "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 4:59 PM:

" ...however, the source of this little tidbit is reliable... "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 4:58 PM:

" ...and as far as the gun permit issue...it's unsubstantiated...perhaps it got shuffle to the wayside with alot of other things going on at that time with Baxter Dunn... "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 4:56 PM:

" ...Pete...I also have children...(I'm against gun control) but I personally do not have a gun for many reasons...think about all the trouble that can happen...I especially would not want my children to accidentally get hold of it.... "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 4:53 PM:

" 367jr...Cingcon will have to take it to his grave but that's a fair trade...he'll be rich...paul will be poor (meaning penniless and pathetic)... "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 6, 2006 4:20 PM:

" to bad the rest of Pauls family has to live with his mistake! "

pete wrote on Mar 6, 2006 3:45 PM:

" and look at what Paul has to carry around, if he has a conscious that is. I feel really feel bad for his kids, as I have children too, and what I do in my life reflects on them for ever. sad. "

367jr wrote on Mar 6, 2006 3:36 PM:

" Onguard....If CINGCON gets the Paul off (No not the same manner which Lamont does) he'll have to live with that on his conscious....look what that did for JOHNNY COCHRAN! "

pete wrote on Mar 6, 2006 3:24 PM:

" "onguard" very interesting bit! did the court bring this to anyone’s attention? that Paul was denied a concealed weapon permit by the SJ Sheriff's Dept! before the shooting! WOW!!!!! that would be nice to know don’t you think! "

MHRC wrote on Mar 6, 2006 3:08 PM:

" People this all comes down to simple math, 2 EYEWITNESSES testified there was no knife, Paul testified(LIED) that there was a knife, who you gonna believe??????? "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 3:07 PM:

" ...if I were a client who pays for paul's services with taxpayer money...I would want to know.... "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 6, 2006 3:06 PM:

" The jury should do the right thing and convict. Even if the guy does'nt have a conscious and does'nt care about the Hasty's this story and the related info will live on via the internet. The electronic medium will be the ghost that haunts him. "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 3:06 PM:

" ...when paul is found innocent, I still think he should take a lie detector test to prove his innocense. x has a good point about paul's business clients... "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 2:58 PM:

" SORRY...should read where the family (company) money is stashed...oh by the way...heresay here or there is that paul was denied a concealed weapon permit by the SJ Sheriff's Dept shortly before the murder...hmmmm "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 2:55 PM:

" ...may have something to do with either where the family is headed if convicted and where the family (company)...this is why we are all idiots... "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 2:54 PM:

" ...some of us haven't forgot about that...I think it has more to due with the impending wrongful death suite...I think all of "Daddy Lamont's" cryptic greek messages... "

ADA wrote on Mar 6, 2006 2:52 PM:

" PETE.... SAD BUT TRUE FOR SURE "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 2:52 PM:

" 367jr...isn't amazing how money can afford you good counsel? Good counsel changes the story over time (2 1/2 yrs). The original story in LNS on 10/14/03 "Alamo Alarm Co Employee Involved in Shooting" "

ADA wrote on Mar 6, 2006 2:51 PM:

" PETE.... SAD BUT TURE FOR SURE "

pete wrote on Mar 6, 2006 2:13 PM:

" Hey "X" "NEWS FLASH the Hasty's are NOT ON TRIAL", some here think so! and forgot that Paul is on trial...... "

367jr wrote on Mar 6, 2006 1:27 PM:

" What is really pathetic about Paul(besides putting his son on the stand)Why did he bring the busines into the situation by lying about his reason for being at Deide's house? "

x wrote on Mar 6, 2006 12:51 PM:

" NEWS FLASH the Hasty's are NOT ON TRIAL "

ID wrote on Mar 6, 2006 12:10 PM:

" x - but both sides should take it because it is the Hasty side that has made all the vengeful remarks and retributious statements. that way we ALL will know who is truthful and who is a liar. case closed. "

x wrote on Mar 6, 2006 11:32 AM:

" ID yes it would. I really don't care about who it truthful in the Hasty family because myself and the community (City of Lodi, LUSD etc) does not do business with the Hastys "

ID wrote on Mar 6, 2006 11:21 AM:

" I think a lie detector test is a good idea. Why would the Hasty family enter the 5th? A lie test would tell what they don't want to say or what they are hiding. And also tell if the Alamo's are telling the truth. Then would you all be happy? "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 11:21 AM:

" Pete...Lamont has been suspiciosly absent since late Saturday...I have a gut feeling that Lamont is really either Paul's or Sharon's father...he refers to the "grandkids" alot... "

pete wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:42 AM:

" would the deliberations end today? or will it take few days? "

pete wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:36 AM:

" I believe Dave sr, came from Bay alarm a few years back "

x wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:34 AM:

" no anyone who does PLEASE POST "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:28 AM:

" Hey "x" do you have any idea what happened? "

x wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:23 AM:

" yeah after that article broke there was a mass exodus of employees including the Dave jr and sr. "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 6, 2006 10:01 AM:

" Alamo alarm Co was mentioned in the police beat section of Lodi News paper a month ago, did they ever find out what that’s about? is there violence at the work place too? what happened to the peaceful-man, doesn’t sound peaceful at Alamo alarm to me. "

Bill.S wrote on Mar 6, 2006 9:21 AM:

" What about a B/S detector for paul, then maybe we would all know where the knife is! "

sue wrote on Mar 6, 2006 8:57 AM:

" a lie detector test would be a great idea! then everyone would know even the Hasty family "

pete wrote on Mar 6, 2006 8:28 AM:

" "Critical Thinker" The same here, everyone that speaks of this says the same thing! and I have yet to meet anyone that says Pual did the right thing! "

Critical Thinker wrote on Mar 6, 2006 7:57 AM:

" This site is probably a mirror of the community and 97% of the comments leave the impression that the defendant should pay for the crime. Jurrors should do the right thing and convict on all counts. "

onguard wrote on Mar 6, 2006 6:21 AM:

" TAKE A LIE DETECTOR TEST...PAUL..