Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
October 31st, 2009
October 30th, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

Species Act co-author searches for Republican to topple Pombo

By Nick Juliano
San Joaquin News Service
Tuesday, September 27, 2005 6:55 AM PDT

Richard Pombo may have a sooner-than-expected fight to keep his seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, as a former congressman announced his intention Monday to find a primary challenger for the Tracy Republican in next year's election.

"The Republican values that I grew up with, Pombo is not espousing," said Pete McCloskey, who represented the San Francisco Peninsula in the House from 1967 to 1983.

The former Congressman said he's been working for three months to find a primary challenger. If one doesn't emerge, the 77-year-old Republican said he may move to the district to challenge Pombo himself.

McCloskey, a co-author of the 1973 Endangered Species Act, was among a panel of farmers, fishermen and environmentalists at a press conference who criticized Pombo's proposed overhaul of the landmark environmental legislation.

Pombo has lost touch with his Republican roots, McCloskey charged, and is now more concerned with supporting his campaign contributors than his constituents in California's 11th Congressional District.

A Pombo consultant chuckled when told of McCloskey's potential candidacy, saying he follows his own agenda in advocating niche liberal causes and only seldom is on the same page as most Republicans.

"It's not correct to say that he represents moderate Republicans because he doesn't," said Wayne Johnson, Pombo's campaign consultant.

McCloskey has a long history of breaking with the Republican Party, beginning with his challenge to former President Nixon in the 1972 New Hampshire primary through his support of John Kerry's presidential campaign last year.

At Monday's press conference, McCloskey said Pombo's bill undercuts and reverses the most important facets of the legislation he helped write 32 years ago. One change could remove the government's ability to designate "critical habitat" so species that are declining in number can recover.

Another suggested change to the law would give the Interior Secretary authority to decide on what is the "best available science" when it makes a decision that involves an endangered species.

McCloskey complained that could lead to politics muddying scientific data.

"This is an administration which has repeatedly derogated or suppressed scientific opinion which opposed the agenda of the politicians," McCloskey said.

McCloskey also criticized an idea floated by Pombo last week to sell off national parks, slap advertisements on the sides of parks service vehicles and drill for oil off the California coast.

Pombo aides said the ideas - included in a laundry list of possibilities sent to the Congressional Budget Office - were not to be taken seriously. Their intent was to drum up support for drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Reserve as a more palatable means to raise the $2.4 billion Pombo's committee needed for budget reconciliation.

The choice does not have to be so stark - either privatize some parks or drill in Alaska - McCloskey said, suggesting the government try to save money by cutting fuel costs and employing more renewable energy sources.

"It's so transparent ... these guys are selling the store," McCloskey said.

Reader Feedback

Comments on this story are now closed.