Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Supercenter: Still a part of Lodi's future? (122)
- Report: Death penalty system in California is flawed, costly (81)
- How to fight our gun-obsessed culture? Burn your copy of 'The Godfather' and push for a $20 tax on each bullet sold (80)
- Redevelopment approved (71)
- Delta College $62.5 million over bond budget (69)
- 3 Lodi playgrounds likely to be removed; no funds available to replace them (50)
- Lodi lottery retailer, son arrested in sting (46)
- New superintendent, Cathy Nichols-Washer, aims to raise academic standards of district (34)
- Lodi's redevelopment project (26)
- Wal-Mart won't invest in community (24)
The Search for Open Space: A day-by-day look at the series
Today
• Preservation of open space has drawn much talk, but little action. Time may be running out, though options remain.
• For farmers, establishment of a buffer could have huge financial stakes.
• The Williamson Act is helping preserve hundreds of acres between Lodi and Stockton.
• Fairfield and other cities have created their own greenbelts or buffers.
Monday
• Supporters say open space brings many benefits, from higher property values to the protection of community identity.
• Stockton's politics and planning process could affect a buffer between Lodi and Stockton.
• South San Joaquin County wrestles with preserving farmland and accommodating growth from the Bay Area.
• Developers say growth is inevitable and can be well-designed and managed.
• Is a habitat preservation plan a model for saving open space?
Tuesday
• What are the options for saving the green? We look at a farm conservation trust in Merced County and other approaches.
• Are open space and affordable housing both possible?
• Lodi's top planner shares his vision.
• What role will Flag City play in future development?
• Questionnaire: What do you think about preserving open space around Lodi?

Reader Feedback
Note to Commenters: Valid Registration Required
Effective immediately, we will be reviewing registration information submitted by commenters. This includes phone number, name and address. While most commenters have been providing this information, a few registrants have used clearly incomplete or invalid information. We hope our ability to internally verify this information allows us to better monitor these comment boards. Those who have registered with invalid information, and who violate the rules of this forum, may be blocked from further posts. Thank you for your cooperation.
Rich Hanner
Editor