Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Galt trustees approve state agriculture grant

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:00 pm

Galt high school district trustees approved funding a controversial state agriculture grant Tuesday, despite concerns the school’s ag program drains money from other departments.

The state agricultural education incentive grant has become an annual struggle between critics claiming its requirements are too costly to the district and supporters seeking to maintain funding.

Tension between the two sides culminated Tuesday with board president Ann Ullrich rapping her gavel several times on the table to end an out-of-turn debate sparked by a district teacher opposing the funding.

At issue is how the district spends more than $128,000 to have six ag teachers work with students in the summer and have an extra class period during the school year to help students with projects — both stipulations of the state grant.

The $35,720 state grant funds textbooks and supplies, travel expenses for field trips and conferences and equipment for the school’s 430-student ag program. But to get the state funding, the district commits more than $27,000 in matching funds.

Several parents spoke in support of Galt High’s ag program and plead for continued funding through the grant.

Parent Mary Robertson thanked the school board for maintaining the program which she said gives students self-confidence and career goals.

“My child is very motivated and looking to the future,” she said.

Math teacher Bob Rappleye, who has been a staunch opponent of the grant, argued the district needed to stop subsidizing the school’s ag program and spend more money on other curriculum areas.

The ag department has stirred animosity among other educators on campus by having smaller class-sizes and project periods, Rappleye said.

Trustee Jim Aschwanden defended the school’s ag program, saying it’s unique in its needs, more so than any other program on campus.

Teachers often work after school outside of the school day and typical school year to work with students and their projects, he said.

Aschwanden said he refused to cut back an instructional program without reducing other budget areas such as extracurricular activities.

In the end, trustees Sue Roberts and Pat Maple voted against funding the grant, though they didn’t dispute the quality of Galt High’s ag program.

Roberts disagreed with capping the class-size lower than the school’s core classes such as English, math and science.

Maple took issue with the inequities of the school’s educational programs, but said his gripes would be defeated by the majority of the board.

“I’ve been around long enough to spit in the wind. It just comes back in your face,” he said.


Comments about this story? Send mail to the News-Sentinel newsroom.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE LODI NEWS-SENTINEL

To subscribe to the Lodi News-Sentinel, fill out our online form or call our Subscriber Services Department at (209) 333-1400.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists